Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Monique Y. Herman" wrote: > >> Have you considered running spamassassin or similar to cut >> down on this noise?
[...] > I've thought about it. I have some misgivings, simply because > I'm tired of getting any false positives at all. FYI, I've *never* seen a false positive using the spambayes classifier. It makes a nice front-end to TMDA, especially since it's written in Python. I keep meaning to plug the two together sometime. Pure Bayesian approaches are a little safer IMHO than rule-based because you don't have to trust someone else's idea of what you consider ham. -Drew _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
