On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 at 22:37 GMT, Erik Max Francis penned:
> "Monique Y. Herman" wrote:
> 
>> Have you considered running spamassassin or similar to cut down on
>> this noise?
>> 
>> I run SA through procmail, then use tmda to look for the SA headers
>> and route flagged mail to a spam mailbox.
> 
> I've thought about it.  I have some misgivings, simply because I'm
> tired of getting any false positives at all.  (Previously I was using
> a similar blacklisting filter which originally I had as procmail
> recipes and then converted to a Python script.)  Another major issue
> is that simply because of the mail volume, I'm reticent to spend
> additional processing resources if I don't have to.  A started
> gravitating toward a whitelisting system because of the minimal CPU
> work required per received email (compared with, say, SpamAssassin or
> SpamBayes) and the simplicity.  (Originally I was going to write my
> own minimal whitelisting filter, but I found TMDA and realized it had
> everything I wanted and much more.)
> 
> Even if I did eventually switch to a SA/TMDA combination, I think the
> suggestion has merit.  Even for people with relatively low spam loads,
> being able to automatically single out
> not-delivered-but-possibly-interesting email automatically seems
> useful.  (In that case you'd interactively check the marked mail first
> more attentively, then check the rest of it.)
> 

Any particular reason to keep it in the queue rather than routing it to
a "possibly-interesting" mailbox?


-- 
monique

_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to