> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:39:08 -0700
> From: Monique Y. Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Negating filter rules?
>
> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 at 22:33 GMT, Jason R. Mastaler penned:
> > "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> The only false positive I've ever seen with spamassassin
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I think you've been very lucky.  I've seen all kinds of braindead
> > false positives (perfectly valid and legit messages) from SA over the
> > years.  I used to keep a folder of them, but gave up after awhile
> > since it became an exercise in inevitability.
>
>
> Well, I've only started using SA in the last few months.  You say you've
> been using it for years ... perhaps it's become much more accurate with
> time?

I stopped using SA because it was getting too many false positives.  It
was marking a few a week and that was too many.  Most of the false
positives were company mailing lists that I had actually subscribed to,
but some were things like source code or a friend sending me a link.

Benjamin J. Stassart
------------------------------------------------+
 A great many people think they are thinking    |
 when they are merely rearranging their         |
 prejudices                                     |
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to