If they guy can program enough to make a spam program why doesn't he just make is copy of tmda do what he needs it to do. I don't think the world should conform to his idea or even a small group of peoples idea of what they think is correct. I LOVE TMDA, and if I could program, yes there would be a few things I would change and add, But I Can't so I just ask nice and help provide something like with the TLS, I asked and I also provide a source for tls python modules. It's not going to be done and I didn't jump up and down and have a shit fit. Life is the way it is and I guess this guy will not stop.
Having a bad day and sticking your foot in your mouth is one thing, ( We all know I have been there ) but this guy doesn't stop so it's a bad attitude! Let's see if we can go on to more positive stuff. Anyone know of a list of features we are looking at seeing in newer versions of tmda now that we have hit Version 1 series? -John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: bug in TMDA 1.0 and prior > "Chris Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Perhaps what we need is a new header Precedence: Challenge > > The problem is that this is useless unless other auto-responders know > they should not respond to messages containing 'Precedence: Challenge'. > > The IETF draft I referenced recommends 'Auto-Submitted: auto-replied' > for this purpose, and TMDA does set this, as does Sendmail and other > mail software. > > I set 'Precedence: bulk' in addition for backwards compatibility > because I know there are auto-responders out there who look for this, > but who will probably never be updated to respect Auto-Submitted. > _____________________________________________ > tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users > _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
