If the attorney were to make a bunch of "legal" words have a score of, say, -1.2, it could further reduce the chance of a legit mail being confirmed (although It wouldn't do much for legal spam - but it beats nothing at all).
Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I see several of them saying that when they see a challenge come backBullocks. http://tmda.net/faq.cgi?req=all#1.5
after they sent an e-mail to someone, they just flat out delete it.
It is a matter of getting your templates worded well.
For example the default template starts off netural (auto gen msg) then is negative (being held... NOT verified) then instructional
Maybe more positive wording would get people to confirm more.
I have a lawyer that was using tmda and he ended up turning it off because he found a lot of his clients would not confirm. (his words: people are morons and can't read) (maybe that's just his clientel :) )
I had not given it much thought since I hardly read the messages since I know what they are from the subject...
Now I have to say that firends and family have not had *any* trouble but a more up-beat wording might help them too...
Yes that argument is bogus, but better templates can make the argument forgotten...
tom
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
-- Anti-Spam Information
By default, all outgoing mail from me is tagged to allow responses unchallenged for up to 14 days if sent to people who have not confirmed their address. If you reply after 14 days, you must confirm your address. This is done by checking your email, and either replying to or clicking on the link in the message which is automatically sent back. You should only need to do this once. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
