You know if you were able to share detailed info on how you set this up it
would
be GREAT. I think this could be of use to many of us..

-John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlos Averett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Scolding opinions on Challenge / Response systems.....


> After some tweaking to the default scores, I made TMDA only confirm the
> messages that fail a spamassassin check.  By giving certain keywords
> negative scores, and whitelists for mailing lists, I have gotten no spam
> at all, except for the ones to the lists (I have them whitelisted, to be
> sure).
>
> If the attorney were to make a bunch of "legal" words have a score of,
> say, -1.2, it could further reduce the chance of a legit mail being
> confirmed (although It wouldn't do much for legal spam - but it beats
> nothing at all).
>
> Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
>
> >>David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I see several of them saying that when they see a challenge come back
> >>>after they sent an e-mail to someone, they just flat out delete it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Bullocks.  http://tmda.net/faq.cgi?req=all#1.5
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >It is a matter of getting your templates worded well.
> >
> >For example the default template starts off netural (auto gen msg)
> >then is negative (being held... NOT verified)
> >then instructional
> >
> >Maybe more positive wording would get people to confirm more.
> >
> >I have a lawyer that was using tmda and he ended up turning it
> >off because he found a lot of his clients would not confirm.
> >(his words: people are morons and can't read)
> >(maybe that's just his clientel :) )
> >
> >I had not given it much thought since I hardly read the messages
> >since I know what they are from the subject...
> >
> >Now I have to say that firends and family have not had *any* trouble
> >but a more up-beat wording might help them too...
> >
> >Yes that argument is bogus, but better templates can make the argument
> >forgotten...
> >
> >tom
> >
> >
> >_____________________________________________
> >tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
> >
> >
>
>
> -- 
> Anti-Spam Information
>
> By default, all outgoing mail from me is tagged to allow responses
> unchallenged for up to 14 days if sent to people who have not confirmed
> their address.  If you reply after 14 days, you must confirm your
> address.  This is done by checking your email, and either replying to
> or clicking on the link in the message which is automatically sent back.
> You should only need to do this once.
> _____________________________________________
> tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
>

_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to