|
Continuing from my previous post...
The reply to address for the last challenge is as
expected:
Date: Thu Feb 5 14:59:36 PST 2004
From: "Sean
Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj:
Re: Re: Testing vacation message
Actn: CONFIRM pending
1076021976.17275.msg
(1451)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 3:05
PM
Subject: Re: Problem with vacation
message program with TMDA
This is a dump from my Logfile Incomming as
requested.
Date: Thu Feb 5 14:56:58 PST 2004
From: "Sean
Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subj: Testing vacation message
Actn: CONFIRM pending
1076021818.17143.msg
(1386)
Date: Thu Feb 5 14:58:22 PST 2004
From: "Sean
Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subj: Re: Testing vacation message
Actn: CONFIRM pending
1076021902.17200.msg
(3292)
Date: Thu Feb 5 14:59:36 PST 2004
From: "Sean
Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subj: Re: Re: Testing vacation message
Actn: CONFIRM pending
1076021976.17275.msg
(1451)
In each case, the message corresponding to the
confirm address does exist and is in my ~/pending/ directory.
Thanks in advance for the help.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:15
AM
Subject: Re: Problem with vacation message
program with TMDA
> "sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> > Hi there. I am having problems with using
the vacation message
> > program on my FreeBSD 5.x system.
>
>
> > I am using tmda 0.87.
>
> This is pretty
old...
>
> > The problem is this:
> >
> > I
set the .forward file to read as follows,
> >
> > ' \userid,
"|/usr/bin/vacation userid" ' where userid is replaced with an actual
userid.
>
> How does TMDA get the message? According to
forward(5), a leading '\'
> character means the message is delivered
directly to the
> mailspool.... Does this really mean it uses the
MDA defined in the
> config file (procmail, if Sendmail is configured
for use with TMDA)?
>
> > The system works perfectly for those
who are already whitelisted.
> > However, if someone is not
whitelistsed there is a problem.
> > Everything goes as expected...
the sender received the vacation
> > message along with a challenge
from TMDA.
> >
> > However, if the message is then replied
to... the sender receives an
> > additional response from TMDA...
this time with an addtional Re:
> > attached. If this is then
replied to, same thing. This goes on and
> > on and on and will
not go through. The sender keeps getting a reply
> > from TMDA
with an addtional Re: each time.
>
> We need more
information. At a minimum, what does LOGFILE_INCOMING
> say about
the reply to the confirmation message?
>
>
> Tim
>
> _____________________________________________
> tmda-users
mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing
list
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
|
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
