Sorry about the html email before. Here it is again in plain text. This is a dump from my Logfile Incomming as requested.
Date: Thu Feb 5 14:56:58 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (1386) Date: Thu Feb 5 14:56:58 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM pending 1076021818.17143.msg (1386) Date: Thu Feb 5 14:58:22 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (3292) Date: Thu Feb 5 14:58:22 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM pending 1076021902.17200.msg (3292) Date: Thu Feb 5 14:59:36 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: Re: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (1451) Date: Thu Feb 5 14:59:36 PST 2004 From: "Sean Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: Re: Testing vacation message Actn: CONFIRM pending 1076021976.17275.msg (1451) as expected the last reply-to address that I get form the challenge is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In each case, the message corresponding to the confirm address does exist and is in my ~/pending/ directory. Thanks in advance for the help. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Legant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:15 AM Subject: Re: Problem with vacation message program with TMDA > "sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi there. I am having problems with using the vacation message > > program on my FreeBSD 5.x system. > > > > I am using tmda 0.87. > > This is pretty old... > > > The problem is this: > > > > I set the .forward file to read as follows, > > > > ' \userid, "|/usr/bin/vacation userid" ' where userid is replaced with an actual userid. > > How does TMDA get the message? According to forward(5), a leading '\' > character means the message is delivered directly to the > mailspool.... Does this really mean it uses the MDA defined in the > config file (procmail, if Sendmail is configured for use with TMDA)? > > > The system works perfectly for those who are already whitelisted. > > However, if someone is not whitelistsed there is a problem. > > Everything goes as expected... the sender received the vacation > > message along with a challenge from TMDA. > > > > However, if the message is then replied to... the sender receives an > > additional response from TMDA... this time with an addtional Re: > > attached. If this is then replied to, same thing. This goes on and > > on and on and will not go through. The sender keeps getting a reply > > from TMDA with an addtional Re: each time. > > We need more information. At a minimum, what does LOGFILE_INCOMING > say about the reply to the confirmation message? > > > Tim > > _____________________________________________ > tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
