-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:36:17PM -0500, Thomas A. Moulton wrote: >> >> Ultimately, TMDA gets the mail meant for it (tagged addresses) and >> treats it on its terms. Email that SA loves (scores under >> required_hits) bypasses TMDA. Everything else is subject to TMDA's >> white/black lists and then either held or challenged based on how much >> SA hated it (X-Spam-Level). >> >> Does that all make sense? > >All but 'Email that SA loves bypasses TMDA.' > >What kind of mail does SA love?
Anything that SA judges NOT to be spam. In the SA config, you can set a score with a line like this: required_hits 1.23 Anything that scores less than that is considered NOT spam, and it's marked that way in the headers that SA adds (X-Spam-Status: No). Does that help? - -- Kyle Hasselbacher | Don't worry about the bullet with your name on it. Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] | out for those marked "occupant."--Murphy's laws of combat -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAO5l910sofiqUxIQRAgHIAKDKEXfLk5KJEk82LOBWxyq5sDDpQQCgtYeO UB046HAnsoMh4GjkCkwVKFA= =JvZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
