> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:36:17PM -0500, Thomas A. Moulton wrote: >>> >>> Ultimately, TMDA gets the mail meant for it (tagged addresses) and >>> treats it on its terms. Email that SA loves (scores under >>> required_hits) bypasses TMDA. Everything else is subject to TMDA's >>> white/black lists and then either held or challenged based on how >>> much SA hated it (X-Spam-Level). >>> >>> Does that all make sense? >> >>All but 'Email that SA loves bypasses TMDA.' >> >>What kind of mail does SA love? > > Anything that SA judges NOT to be spam. In the SA config, you can set > a score with a line like this: > > required_hits 1.23 > > Anything that scores less than that is considered NOT spam, and it's > marked that way in the headers that SA adds (X-Spam-Status: No). > > Does that help?
Yes, but if everything that SA considers not to be spam bypasses TMDA why do we have TMDA at all? Sounds like SA will let some spam through if it judges wrong. So why not let TMDA handle those? tom _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
