On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:33:29PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > tmda-pending, IMHO, is utterly useless for "browsing" through > > messages; it should really only be a cron/command line tool. MUA's, > > on the other hand, are written specifically for browsing through > > messages. It is inevitable that all (or at least most) of us will > > eventually need to browse/search the pending queue for a lost > > message; why not use the best tool for the job? > > Well, as evidenced by this thread, the issue of converting pending to > a Maildir wasn't exactly straightforward. What do you think of the > Maildir/.folder idea that has been proposed?
I read those messages but I'm still not 100% on how it would work and what it would give me. > > As far as identifying messages, I can think of several ways it could > > be done, although they all involve storing pieces of information > > that were not previously stored, such as: > > > > md5sum or other checksum of the message > > adding a temporary header when the message is written into the pending > > queue, and removing it upon delivery > > storing the message-ID, which should be unique > > etc... > > I don't understand what problem you are addressing here. Could you > elaborate? Just mumbling about how you could keep track of messages in the pending maildir besides using the filenames. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA http://flounder.net/publickey.html | 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
