Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > "Jesse D. Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<snip> > I'm reading it. I'm surprised this hasn't already been implemented. > Perhaps it's not so trivial in qmail. Jason, have you seen the most recent post by Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> regarding identification of bounces vs autoresponders? I'd like to get your feedback on that if you don't mind. I think a direct SMTP probe may be a better solution since it makes bad sender address caching viable (thus reducing system load and bandwidth), but I'd still like to know what you think about it. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
