On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:14:31PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:14:01PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > > Your English seems fine to me, but if you'd like, I can assist in the > > drafting of this document (correct and embellish where appropriate to > > enhance and maintain clarity). Then at least we'd have a published > > spec available somewhere where other adopters could evaluate it. I > > can help field questions/comments from that point on as well. > > Thanks a lot. I'll try to create a draft in the next days/weeks, and > then respond to the offer.
Well, I didn't get to this, sorry. And I decided not to create such a document, as I'm not eager to push this project. It works for me and my mailing lists and this is the main thing, and I'm involved in other open projects that take their time also. Anyway, whoever is interested in how qconfirm implements a delivery confirmation process, and automatically responding to requests, with just using the envelope, mail address extensions, the Message-ID, and the Reply-To: or From: field from the header, can install it on a test system. The special Message-ID for confirmation request message would be the only thing that must be agreed upon, all other logic can be implemented on the challenged side, as qconfirm shows. But a TMDA confirmation request message already contains all information needed to reliably identify a request and act accordingly, so there's not necessarily the need for the special Message-ID. I plan to implement automatic confirmation of TMDA challenges this way in qconfirm. Thanks, Gerrit. -- Open projects at http://smarden.org/pape/. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
