On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:14:01PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think it'll take a long time until one of the proposed standards > > is accepted > Very true, but at least this would give us interoperability until a > standard emerges. At that point, I'd migrate to the standard, but I > assume you (and ASK) would as well?
Yes, sure. > > and since the special usage of the Message-ID does nothing which > > could cause trouble for such proposed standards, it can be deployed > > right now. > This isn't a guarantee, but I think my earlier point is enough. If we > adopt your suggestion now, and then move to the standard when it > emerges, we'll all be fine. Yes, exactly what I thought. > > I could write up a technical document on how it works, but my > > english skills are not good enough to push it, and convince other > > people. > > Your English seems fine to me, but if you'd like, I can assist in the > drafting of this document (correct and embellish where appropriate to > enhance and maintain clarity). Then at least we'd have a published > spec available somewhere where other adopters could evaluate it. I > can help field questions/comments from that point on as well. Thanks a lot. I'll try to create a draft in the next days/weeks, and then respond to the offer. Regards, Gerrit. -- Open projects at http://smarden.org/pape/. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
