On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 11:53:14AM -0500, J C Lawrence wrote: > The same logic, and arguably better, would have the Message ID of the > reported message quoted in the delivery-status part of the DSN. This is > allowed under RFC 3464 as extension fields (2.4). I am not aware of the
Sure. There're many ways to do it, and one could argue about that. But that's not what I currently want to do. It's very easy to construct a Message-ID as I suggest, and it's very easy to parse it. And if TMDA starts doing it, it can stop doing it at any time without breaking anything. It's just that then qconfirm users need to confirm delivery manually. It seems that we agree that using a special Message-ID for notifications doesn't interfere with any known standard, and doesn't interfere with any proposed standard we're aware of. So IMHO it's a good start to see how auto-confirming works out in the ``real world'', until a standard accepted. Regards, Gerrit. -- Open projects at http://smarden.org/pape/. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
