I think we do so by praying as we read, for God to help us understand, then
by reading verses in context rather than stringing isolated verses
together. The church I went to as a teenager strongly advocated reading the
Bible through, and that has been the biggest help to me. There are seeming
opposites in the Bible that hold each other in balance, and a lot of error
comes in when people tip one way or the other.

Barbara H.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> *Janet,*
> **
> *I hope you ran out of that neurologists office really fast!  And, I
> assume you never went back.  *
> **
> *Barbarah,*
> **
> *You are right too.  That's why I find the Bible so confusing.  How is
> one supposed to figure out how to discover it without misconstruing the
> meaning?*
> **
> *Jude in Michigan*
> **
>
>  In a message dated 1/18/2013 11:27:09 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> That is maddeningly ridiculous and sounds more like the idea of karma. Job
> was afflicted even though God Himself said he had done nothing wrong. In
> John 9:1-4 it says, "As [Jesus] passed by, he saw a man blind from birth. And
> his disciples asked him, 'Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that
> he was born blind?' Jesus answered, 'It was not that this man sinned, or
> his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.'"
>
> I once wrote up an extensive list of reasons the Bible gives for suffering:
> http://barbarah.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/scriptural-reasons-for-suffering/
>
> Barbara H.
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Janet Dunn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  The last neuro that I went to told me that when you are not living a
>> good life, then God will afflict you.  When you  straighten up your life
>> and live the way you are supposed to, a way that is pleasing to God, then
>> He will stop the affliction.  He told me to go home and be grateful that my
>> affliction has not caused more damage, and that God has allowed me to get
>> to where I am.  geesh, thanks buddy.
>>
>> Janet
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to