> > I guess the question is that the numbers don't need to be arbitrary. > If I > am looking at the details of a task x, and I see its order number is > n, I > might be interested in looking at what happened right before and after > n, > and I might find useful to narrow down the content of the massive > tasks > table to n-5 to n+5, for example, so that I can focus on the > interesting > subset without being bothered by the noise of the other tasks. >
This can be achieved by sorting the tasks by execution order, which is the sorting order by default. > Having said that, I am very much open to change. If people do agree > that > filtering tasks by their execution order is not useful, let's get rid > of > that filter. > Yeah, let's wait for comments from others. Thanks, Ravi _______________________________________________ toaster mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster
