On 16/01/2014 14:45, "Ravi Chintakunta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I guess the question is that the numbers don't need to be arbitrary. >> If I >> am looking at the details of a task x, and I see its order number is >> n, I >> might be interested in looking at what happened right before and after >> n, >> and I might find useful to narrow down the content of the massive >> tasks >> table to n-5 to n+5, for example, so that I can focus on the >> interesting >> subset without being bothered by the noise of the other tasks. >> > >This can be achieved by sorting the tasks by execution order, which is >the sorting order by default. Indeed, but the noise of all the other tasks before and after will still be there. > > >> Having said that, I am very much open to change. If people do agree >> that >> filtering tasks by their execution order is not useful, let's get rid >> of >> that filter. >> > >Yeah, let's wait for comments from others. > > >Thanks, >Ravi _______________________________________________ toaster mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster
