On 20/01/2014 00:53, "Ravi Chintakunta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Sorting tasks, both ascending and descending, by execution order is >implemented. It is the filtering of tasks by execution order that is not >implemented. > >-Ravi >________________________________________ >From: Reyna, David [[email protected]] >Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 6:45 PM >To: Ravi Chintakunta; 'Barros Pena, Belen'; 'Damian, Alexandru'; Lerner, >Dave; 'Zhang, Jessica' >Cc: '[email protected]' >Subject: RE: filtering tasks by order > >Hi, > >I am curious. > >If you re-sort the table by something other than "execution order", how >would you be able to return to "execution order" if we disable sorting on >this column? I am not sure if I understand correctly, but just to clarify: we shouldn't disable the sorting on the order column. Basically, column headings have 3 main states: - Sortable (looks like a link) - Not sortable (has the class muted applied so is pale grey and has no hover state) - Sorted (black, bold with a caret up or down next to it) The all tasks table is by default sorted by Order, so when you land on that page the Order heading is in the sorted state. If you then click on any of the other sortable headings (for example, recipe) the Order heading moves to the sortable state, and the recipe heading would change to the sorted state. You can click back on the Order heading at any time to sort the table by order again. I hope this makes sense. Any questions, let me know. Belén > >I agree that reverse sorting for "execution order" is not useful, and >should not be supported, but re-asserting a forward sort I think would be >a requirement. > >- David > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ravi Chintakunta [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:33 AM >> To: 'Barros Pena, Belen'; 'Damian, Alexandru'; Reyna, David; Lerner, >> Dave; 'Zhang, Jessica' >> Cc: '[email protected]' >> Subject: RE: filtering tasks by order >> >> Hi Belen, >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> Having said that, I am very much open to change. If people do >> > agree >> > >> that >> > >> filtering tasks by their execution order is not useful, let's >> get >> > rid >> > >> of >> > >> that filter. >> > >> >> > > >> > >Yeah, let's wait for comments from others. >> > > >> > > >> >> I have not implemented filtering tasks by execution order in my latest >> commit. The base code includes displaying filtering options only as >> radio buttons. >> >> I have also not implemented "Show all tasks" button in the tooltip for >> the active filter icon. >> >> Also, can you let me know the css for the active filter icon tooltip. >> >> Thanks, >> Ravi >> >> Also, please let me know the style to use for the active > _______________________________________________ toaster mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster
