Before you people misunderstand the statement, I do not mean that we should accept something only to 'honour' fellow members.
My point here is if we take something on a group's front, we should suggest alternatives if we do not like the process. If majority does not show any interest, and are dead against, fine, do not take it up in the first place. People talk about education and providing necessities to children, but can leave people hungry!! How come. If a child is feeling hungry and in bare foot and if we ask what she/he wants, what would they reply? Food or Slippers or Books or a Game!!! On 3/9/07, Prasanthi Uppalapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Nachaki, May I know your idea about the "better model of FDP that reaches the really-real starving population that cannot earn its own food ever"? I personally do not like SDP. Honestly I never cared to look at the children leave alone bare foot or with slippers. I tried many times to walk on the red hot roads bare foot, feeling like I am soldier :) Soldiers do not care for weather conditions but are always immersed in their mission. That was my thought. That doesn't mean I do not work for SDP. I do not like means I am not fascinated with this idea. But I want to honour the idea of Prasad garu and so thought to provide a means for him to execute it. Coming to the point, I do not mind people objecting something. But instead of giving a vague thought on 'something will be better', it would be good if people take pains on how we can go about!! At least think in those lines so that they will get with some options. -- Thank you. with regards, PRASANTHI. ---- When you want something, the whole universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
-- Thank you. with regards, PRASANTHI. ---- When you want something, the whole universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
