<< May I know  your idea about the "better model of FDP that reaches the 
really-real starving population that cannot earn its own food ever"? 
...
Coming to the point, I do not mind people objecting something. But instead of 
giving a vague thought on 'something will be better', it would be good if 
people take pains on how we can go about!! At least think in those lines so 
that they will get with some options. >>

Good question, Prasanthi! I had been thinking of a "better model of FDP" ever 
since I wrote the first e-mail about this topic! Of course, I had been! Yet, I 
couldn't come up with an alternate model - I don't call it "better" yet - until 
...I saw this line in your e-mail: "People talk about education and providing 
necessities to children, but can leave people hungry!!"

Can FDP be a tie-up with other groups, grow larger in scale and reach, and be 
implemented in schools? Why or why not? I'd like members to ponder over this a 
minute and think further. BTW, I never said SDP has got something in it to do 
with "education [or] providing necessities to children". Like Prasad gaaru 
wrote earlier, and like I state my personal ambition for the society as 
providing "Education for the literates", education is something else and is not 
necessarily taught in and/or attributable to an institutional outfit. Neither 
FDP nor SDP call any classification by age group or literate-level, of course, 
and I don't intend to suggest binding them one group anyway. Let's find the 
group that needs it most. Probably this "target audience" is defining the 
"goodness of a *DP model" for me, which is why I think FDP in its current form 
is not as effective or "fascinating" - thanks to Prasanthi for the apt word - 
to me.

NaChaKi
PS: My thoughts are still nascent on all these, and I need input. When I wrote 
to the group to suggest a better model, it doesn't mean that I consider myself 
Akbar paadushaa who calls out "Start the show" with a wave of his hand! It's 
because I can't think of any model myself and I need some help in forming my 
ideas. My apologies to anyone I might have hurt with unclear communication. 
(And, no clarifications or apologies-to-apologies or explanations or 
discussions of any kind on my apologies, please. Let's cut all the 
"unnecessary" stuff out. My apologies are essentially because I erred, and not 
because someone felt bad.)

Reply via email to