Regarding the apologies and sarcasms, I am very clear. I do not mail to hurt anyone. But I get angry, I mail it. I mail on why I got angry. I do not hide. I will take care that the group knows that it is not on the person but on the thought or the point about which I got angry or for what I get irritated.
Coming to sarcasms, usually I don't. I make fun and I tease. The smile symbol follows the statement. If I tag Nachaki as Sarvantaryami, it is out of my admiration, what to say, the feeling of awe on how come this person is doing so many things and to be honest, a streak of jealousy :) I very much agree about usage of vocabulary. I am glad that Nachaki found the apt word, 'fascinating'. In fact, in the geocities pages, I clearly mentioned that when we people are doing something with a common baseline agreement, let us not say that 'something is not so good' and search for 'better' option and as the baseline thing is not good, we should think of 'better' option and everyone should think in those lines to search for something 'better'. As Ratan ji pointed how can we know that someone is needy? In fact, Paparao garu didn't say anything about their poverty and I just ignored. I felt really bad that they do not have money to buy food and some other patient is providing them with food. Instead of acknowledging our efforts, that we are trying our level best to see to that the contributions are reaching the very needy people, you begin to say that you do not like particular project but you wish to think of a 'better' option. You may get angry that I got angry. But when you work on field and when you concentrate all your resources on a project, and someone says 'are we reaching the needy'? After all can anyone define the needy? Aren't the photos an example? Upto which degree we feel that we should execute? We try that we should be perfect 100%. In reality it is not possible. Let us take an example, there are two kids playing on the road. One is very poor and one is somewhat better though poor. We wanted to distribute food packets. Shall we give to one child and ignore the other child? In fact, we did. Not with children. But with elder people. When people come and ask us, we say in a polite way that they shouldn't ask us as such and we are giving to completely helpless people. Now that I get a feeling to stop everything. Take our own time. brainstorm. Then decide what we want to do and what we shouldn't do. That would be the best option. In fact, I sometimes doubt whether I am writing Greek and Latin that no one can understand what I am trying to convey. -- Thank you. with regards, PRASANTHI. ---- When you want something, the whole universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
