>> >actually, i think i might prefer something like mod_ajp and >ajp_. if >> >jtc means jakarta-tomcat-connector, that might be a little too >> >generic. >> >what do you call the next connector protocal? >> >> and ajp = Apache Jakarta Protocol (which not much clear) >> > >so, do you envision one native library and one set of connectors (for >apache, iis, etc.) that support all connector protocols? if so, then >mod_jtc and jtc_ make more sense to me. The original goal is to provide support for Apache1.3/2.0/IIS/NES/JNI using for example ajp12/ajp13/ajp14. But there is also a JNI mode used for example by IBM to link their apache to their websphere. jtc seems less related to just ajp....
- [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors re... kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connector... cmanolache
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri