GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> >actually, i think i might prefer something like mod_ajp and
> >ajp_. if
> >> >jtc means jakarta-tomcat-connector, that might be a little too
> >> >generic.
> >> >what do you call the next connector protocal?
> >>
> >> and ajp = Apache Jakarta Protocol (which not much clear)
> >>
> >
> >so, do you envision one native library and one set of connectors (for
> >apache, iis, etc.) that support all connector protocols? if so, then
> >mod_jtc and jtc_ make more sense to me.
>
> The original goal is to provide support for Apache1.3/2.0/IIS/NES/JNI
> using for example ajp12/ajp13/ajp14. But there is also a JNI mode
> used for example by IBM to link their apache to their websphere.
>
> jtc seems less related to just ajp....
somebody mentioned the directory structure should look something like
this:
[sub-project]/src/java
what would examples of subprojects be under jakarta-tomcat-connectors?
jtc? mod_jtc? ajp? i guess i've gotten a little confused here....
