In that case, what is the point of warp. Is it going to be faster, more
scalable or something? If not why was it created?
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: connector status in tomcat 4
>Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:43:41 +0200
>
> >I thought the idea of warp/webapp was that it was to support
> >servlet api 2.3
> >and ajp/jk couldn't eaily be modified to support the new specs.
>
>What's the supposed features in 2.3 that ajp/jk couldn't support ?
>At least there will be in ajp14/jk the autoconfig (ie list of
>URL/URI handled ) =>
>
>/examples/servlet/*
>/examples/*.jsp
>/examples/*.xml
>
> >
> >Dave
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >>From: kevin seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: connector status in tomcat 4
> >>Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:52:43 -0500
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Ok, so which one would you say should has highest priority?
> >> >
> >>
> >>that probably depends on who you ask ;-)
> >>
> >> > Having a quick look at the CVS repository I see
> >>jakarta-tomcat-connectors,
> >> > which contains the jk-park, and in jakarta-tomcat I see
> >the warp/webapp.
> >>Is
> >> > this right? Won't ajp13/jk be included in tc4? Is it going to be
> >>replaced by
> >> > warp/webapp?
> >> >
> >>
> >>jakarta-tomcat-connectors (jtc) is a new module where connectors like
> >>ajp, warp/webapp, etc. should live. the idea is that the
> >core parts of
> >>connectors should be container-agnostic. only the request/response
> >>adapters should know about containers.
> >>
> >>ajp/jk will not be "included" in tc4, but it will support tc4 -- there
> >>will be (is) an ajp13 connector for tc 4 (it's is a work in progress).
> >>going forward, ajp connectors for tc 3, tc 4, and maybe other
> >containers
> >>will live in jtc.
> >>
> >>warp/webapp will not replace ajp/jk, but it will give you another
> >>choice. you'll be free to make the decision yourself as to what
> >>connector you want to use.
> >>
> >> > // Erik
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: kevin seguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 3:05 PM
> >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > Subject: Re: connector status in tomcat 4
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >My question is what the status is on the apache connector in
> >> > > > >tomcat 4. I've
> >> > > > >been testing Jakarta 4 in standalone mode and is very pleased
> >> > > > >with it, but
> >> > > > >we can't run it like that once we release the system for all
> >> > > > >our students..
> >> > > > >;)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > There is actually 2 connectors for Apache Tomcat 4.0 :
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - warp/webapp : Developped specifically for TC 4.0 have
> >> > > > autoconfig stuff but lack load-balancing or IIS/NES support
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - ajp13/jk : Available since TC 3.2, works with TC 3.3 and
> >> > > > now with 4.0 (thanks to Kevin). Miss the autoconfig stuff
> >> > > > (will came in ajp14) but have load-balancing and IIS/NES
> >> > > > support.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > er... the load-balancing doesn't work yet for tc 4 --
> >the java side
> >>of
> >> > > it hasn't been done yet. it shouldn't be too hard to do
> >though :) i
> >> > > think it's just a matter of figuring out what to do with
> >jvmRoute on
> >>the
> >> > > java side (set a cookie??).
> >> > >
> >> > > > Your contribution must match your need !)
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________
> >__________
> >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>http://www.hotmail.com.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
