On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:58:00AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > And, the whole question is what does Tomcat see the request as? I > > could make a case that it should never know about the unparsed_uri, > > but only the uri that httpd finally resolved to and that mod_jk > > picked up. -- justin > >> If we treat apache as a web server, that cooperates with tomcat but can > do at least what a proxy is allowed to do by the HTTP spec ( i.e. alter > the request, etc ) - then we are fine ( except the life is interesting > again, and a lot of work to do including this fix ). This is the way I expect it to behave, but as Keith pointed out, it may be useful to have this as a configuration option. -Dave
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Fw: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix GOMEZ Henri