Remy,

>And why don't you want to write your own wrapper (I doubt Embedded is
>adapted to your use case anyway), and put it in the Avalon tree ? That's why
>I do with the various Catalina wrappers Slide has, and it doesn't cause any
>problems.
>
>Also, not having separated interfaces and implementations doesn't prevent
>from running under Avalon, it only removes the inter-application security,
>which isn't very useful (unless you have a Java mail server which routinely
>tries to hack your Java web server using its internal Java APIs).
>
OK, I'll just write a wrapper that exposes no methods to other 'blocks' 
If we are being asked to use CatalinaService instead of Embedded, then 
there were no useful (internally published) methods available anyway. 
 As such if there are no methods to expose there is no need for *any* 
interface/impl separation.  Therefore I can go ahead as is with the 
currently available Catalina (I guess).

Regards,

- Paul H



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to