----- Original Message ----- From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670
> > I posted to the dev list earlier about needing a small, > > relatively lightweight version of Catalina to embed into > > another program. I spent the weekend putting together > > something that more of less fits my needs. (My needs > > include a relatively small jar, plus no use of the local > > file system) I ended up with a 260k jarfile of the catalina > > classes, plus another 75k or so of new Container classes. > > I suspect there's at least another 100k that can be > > trimmed. > > > The MinimalTomcat code is definitely alpha quality, and it's > > only meant to support the particular subset of Catalina that I > > happen to need right at the moment. It is not, and is not > > intended to be, a complete reimplementation of the Catalina > > core classes. On the other hand, it's substantially smaller > > and less complicated, while retaining the same basic architecture. > > If anyone's interested, feel free to email me at the address > > below, or respond on the list. > > Well, it's not that I want to advocate the "competition", but it seems to me > that Tomcat 3 is more useful for a "MiniTomcat", mainly because it requires > only JDK 1.1 (smaller JDK; J2ME is based on JDK 1.1, so maybe it could end > up being a "target"; that was one of Costin's pet projects, actually). > The main problem that I would see is that you'd have to tweak some classes to get TC 3.3 to run disk-less. Otherwise, yes, Costin has done a lot of work towards letting you run TomKitten 3.3 on your toaster. > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
