Hi Bill. Didn't have any luck with that either (see below). Does it work for you? Any idea what the message about the CVS locks means / how to fix it?
Yeah, I see what you mean re: files in the attic. I'm curious how things looked before I started changing things, to better understand what caused this code collision... -Dan Here's what I got when I tried to do the -r thing: [dan@oogie tmp]$ echo $CVSROOT :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs [dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -r tomcat_4_1_2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0 Protocol error: uncounted data discarded Bill Barker wrote: >"-r tomcat_4_1_2" should work. You could also "add" the files back from the >Attic, since it's a completely different directory. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dan Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:25 PM >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSI Servlet has big problems > > > > >>I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following >> >> >command: > > >>[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -D "4 months ago" jakarta-tomcat-4.0 >> >>And I'm getting the following error: >> >>Core dumped; preserving /tmp/cvs-serv41751 on server. >>CVS locks may need cleaning up. >> >>My version is (on Linux): >> >> >[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs --version >> > >> >Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.1p1 (client/server) >> >>I tried the same thing on Solaris, and had the same problem. >> >>Any idea? Am I doing something stupid? >> >>-Dan >> >>Dan Sandberg wrote: >> >> >> >>>Yes, let's merge them together. How do I get to the code that you >>>fixed? Were the test cases in CVS? >>> >>>I'd say lets get all the test cases setup, and see where my code fails >>>your tests. Then we can use your code wherever functionality is >>> >>> >missing. > > >>>I thought I had checked out the head revision. Did I make a mistake >>>with the cvs check out command? >>> >>>-Dan >>> >>>Paul Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>(Resending from my older address in hopes that it will help avoid >>>>some confusion.) >>>> >>>>Hmmm... >>>> >>>>This is what I get for ignoring the list for a while. ;) >>>> >>>>Note: I completely rewrote the SSI support in 4.x HEAD and had Bip >>>>apply the patches (Amy also did some patching) for exactly the same >>>>reasons you originally mention. I did this around Oct/Nov 2001. On >>>>most of the 4.0 bug reports for SSI (which I agree was a bad >>>>implementation on that branch) I commented that my changes should >>>>probably have been back-ported from head. >>>> >>>>I even had test cases for all of the SSI commands, including the >>>>conditionals which I added support for. >>>> >>>>My only guess is that you were looking at an older version when finding >>>>the problem. My rewrite solved all of these problems and was >>>>completely compatible with all mod_include commands except for the >>>>regex stuff. >>>> >>>>Of course, now it seems that my version has been completely blown >>>>away. Which is unfortunate since that means we lose conditionals... >>>>and possibly some of the more esoteric nesting behavior that I copied >>>>from Apache (I haven't tested this yet.) >>>> >>>>It's too bad that SSI on head was blown away for changes to an older >>>>version. Any chance we can nicely merge the two good versions into >>>>one more good version? >>>> >>>>-Paul Speed >>>> >>>> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
