[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > >>>Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the >>>dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ? >> >>Sure ;-) > > > Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with merging the C code > from daemon into jk2, and continuing the development on the C side > in j-t-c/jk/native2 ?
I am +1 for merging the code but in daemon. I am using the daemon code for projects not related with mod_jk and I would perfer to have it independant from mod_jk. An other point to be against moving it in mod_jk is that the code has been moved recently in commons (sandbox) I do not thing that it is a good idea to move it back in the Tomcat repos. Also if we move it from daemon to mod_jk we have to ask it to the common dev list before moving it. > > There is no point on having 2 codebases that launch the VM from C, > or 2 service launchers. And there is a lot to benefits from both > sides - I think. > > That should happen after jk2.0 is released ( eventually we can > branch when 4.1 is released - and use the main branch ). > > ( one nice benefit may be getting back the ability to start > and control the java process from apache, like jserv did ). That is a feature I need. > > I'm only talking about the C code here. > > Costin > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
