[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > >>>Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the >>>dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ? >> >>Sure ;-) > > > Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with merging the C code > from daemon into jk2, and continuing the development on the C side > in j-t-c/jk/native2 ? > > There is no point on having 2 codebases that launch the VM from C, > or 2 service launchers. And there is a lot to benefits from both > sides - I think. > > That should happen after jk2.0 is released ( eventually we can > branch when 4.1 is released - and use the main branch ). > > ( one nice benefit may be getting back the ability to start > and control the java process from apache, like jserv did ). > > I'm only talking about the C code here.
+1 from me. If we do that, that would mean commons-daemon is not going anywhere: - the interfaces will go away - the launcher code is supposed to end up in Ant If the launcher doesn't end up in Ant, then IMO we should create commons-launcher. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
