Henri Gomez wrote:
> Steve Downey wrote:
>
>> Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be
>> able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as
>> to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't
>> use either directly.
>>
>> Xerces is a different issue. There was a bug that was preventing
>> Tomcat from migrating to the latest version. Unfortunately, I no
>> longer remember the details. Anyone know why we're using 2.1.0
>> instead of 2.2.0?
>
Because, I think, Xerces 2.2.0 was relased two weeks ago. I'm actually
testing Xerces 2.2.....knowing how much problem we have with Xerces
2.0.1 - 2.0.2 and XML Schema, I just want to be sure there is no
regression ;-)
-- Jeanfrancois
>>
>
> From what I experienced with Xerces j 2.2.0 it seems it does
> much more validity check and for instance found a '--' somewhere
> in comments (1 EUR to the first who find where).
>
> Previous version of Xerces or crimson didn't got that problem.
>
> if we could see which xml/dtd/tld is reported buggy, which
> will able to see if it's a bug or a features (ie a more strict
> check of xml rules)
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
