On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:14 pm, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Steve Downey wrote:
> > Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able
> > to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a
> > complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use either
> > directly.
> >
> > Xerces is a different issue. There was a bug that was preventing Tomcat
> > from migrating to the latest version. Unfortunately, I no longer remember
> > the details. Anyone know why we're using 2.1.0 instead of 2.2.0?
>
>  From what I experienced with Xerces j 2.2.0 it seems it does
> much more validity check and for instance found a '--' somewhere
> in comments (1 EUR to the first who find where).
>
> Previous version of Xerces or crimson didn't got that problem.
>
> if we could see which xml/dtd/tld is reported buggy, which
> will able to see if it's a bug or a features (ie a more strict
> check of xml rules)
OK, from the 'this shouldn't work department', this patch 'fixes' the problem:
Index: ./jsr152/src/share/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr152/src/share/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
--- ./jsr152/src/share/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd    13 Aug 2002 16:20:58 
-0000      1.1.1.1
+++ ./jsr152/src/share/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd    3 Oct 2002 20:42:30 
-0000
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@
                          java.lang.String is default.

 declare                  Whether the variable is declared or not.
+
                          True is the default.

 scope                    The scope of the scripting varaible



Something quite strange is going on.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to