Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>> I remember that when I proposed the same thing (roughly) and wanted to >>> call it "Tomcat-HA" or something like it, you said: >>> >>> "If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF gives you >>> permission to use tomcat name in your product." >> >> Can you point to the proposal you made on tomcat-dev and the vote >> results to your proposal ? >> >> Are you saying you made such a proposal and it was voted down ? >> >> Or it was approved and I didn't allowed you to call it whatever >> tomcat-dev decided ? >> >> My comment was in the context of a product named >> "Tomcat-high-availability" that wasn't voted by the tomcat-dev. It >> doesn't matter if it is a revolution or minimal or whatever it does - it >> shouldn't be named "tomcat-anything" without ASF or tomcat-dev >> permission. >> >> If this proposal doesn't pass I won't do it somewhere else and call it >> tomcat-minimal. > > You're better than me in scavanging through EyeBrowse... :-)
It's hard to find something that doesn't exist. I hate the practice of using old postings as arguments in most cases - it's normal for people to change their minds. But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made and was voted on tomcat-dev. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
