Howdy, >> - It'd be hard for the container to support these listeners in a >> performant manner. > >Agreed. It would surely affect the i/o buffer size if set to a small >value.; in the case of Tomcat I believe this is >org.apache.coyote.http11.Constants.DEFAULT_HTTP_HEADER_BUFFER_SIZE (48k). >However, wouldn't prolific JavaDoc ameliorate that issue?
JavaDoc along with a default configuration that retains current performance might be OK. >One use-case is to be able to provide an accurate upload or download >meter; I'm not aware of any way to do this with Servlets....are you? >(Note I said "accurate", not something like an animated gif which is >just a fancy wait cursor). It's funny you raise this point now. We're discussing adding a progress bar to commons-fileupload on the commons-dev list. You may wish to join/follow the discussion, as two other people have what they claim are accurate implementations. Needless to say, neither of them is asking for a servlet specification change. Do you have any other use cases? Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
