The measurement was calculated by taking the median reading of 10 consecutive executions.
Just for your edification they were: New Code: 7373ms 7395ms 7383ms 7370ms 7384ms 7385ms 7395ms 7376ms 7378ms 7393ms Median: 7383.5ms Old code: 8561ms 8560ms 8771ms 8774ms 8771ms 8767ms 8860ms 8775ms 8775ms 8782ms Median: 8772.5ms Difference: 1389ms ~ 15.8% improved My mistake for not wanting to bore the list with minutiae. George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -----Original Message----- > The original code you submitted looks quite bad so I don't trust your > measurements at all, sorry. > > Rémy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
