well yes, thats a point :-) apache will forward a session to a new host if
the host that first "owned" the session (in a sticky sense) fails? Will
apache be aware of a tomcat instance getting back online and start reusing
it for requests? Of cause, I guess... I will have to start looking into
this - and using it :-)

Jan


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Filip Hanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:01 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 clustering


> yeah, clustering (session replication) will only gain you fail over and
high
> availability, not performance
>
> Filip
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Agermose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:26 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5 clustering
> >
> >
> > well I cannot really say I have a problem.. I'm not using clustering -
yet
> > :-)
> >
> > But I am somewhat interested in the performance of this... What I mean
is,
> > if You have sticky session You do not really cain anythink from
> > ditributing
> > the session, now do you? That looks like a performance hit for nothing?
> >
> > And since im not that big a fan of using something like www1, www2 and
so
> > on... Am I out of options? How can I take advantage of this???
> >
> > I guess my problem is I need some insigt on how to supercharge my
> > applications :-)
> >
> > jan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Filip Hanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 clustering
> >
> >
> > > not sure what your problem is Jan,
> > > the clustering code is all-to-all node replication, so whether you
have
> > > sticky sessions or round robin loadbalancing, it will work
> > >
> > > Filip
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jan Agermose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:50 AM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5 clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ok but how would you use it...
> > > >
> > > > If you have apache in front of the different tomcat instances,
> > > > apache would
> > > > route the same browsersession to the same tomcatinstance on each
> > > > request, or
> > > > not? This would make session sharing useless?
> > > >
> > > > And if there's no webserver in front you need different
domainnames -
> > lige
> > > > www, www1, www2 ??? or?? different domainnames suck :-D
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:36 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5 clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Jan Agermose wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I'm not using version 5 but was looking for information on what
> > > > > >> clustering capabilities that where build into tomcat 5 - but I
> > cannot
> > > > > >> find anything on the webpage... looking in the wrong places :-)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Could you offer any links? Is it simply a distributed session
> > > > > >> implementation or?!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know much about it. Basically, it's a simple
> > multicast based
> > > > > > session replication implementation, written by Filip
> > Hanik (you may
> > > > > > remember his TC 4 clustering article). There are indeed no docs
> > about
> > > > > > that at the moment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Remy is right... (of course :) )
> > > > > Tomcat 4.1 backport consists of a single patch as a jar file,
> > > > it uses the
> > > > > universal good library for replication (the same as Jboss
> > uses for EJB
> > > > > clustering)..Works well but requires a little knowledge of
> > > > networking (UDP
> > > > > & so on)...
> > > > > > <ad>For more complete clustering, there's JB, of course :)</ad>
> > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to