Interesting...

I only get this with apache 2.0.48 from
ldd /usr/local/apache2/lib/libapr-0.so.9.5:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6(0x42000000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)

I guess that means I didn't build with the LD_FLAGS that you mentioned.

The include-os-type=include/linux would give me an error in configure.  I
imagine that was because there was no directory in the mod_jk2 directory
for that. Is that something that's only available with the CVS version?

Anyways, thanks for the info and good luck finding employment.

I'm gonna go ahead and try what I've got and report back to the list to 
see if it all works.

Oscar

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Mark Eggers wrote:

> Oscar,
> 
> This is all pretty much in a bug I posted to on
> naygoya.apache.org (#17762).
> 
> If you build Apache with all shared modules, then
> there are some dependencies in apr and aprutil.  An
> ldd from 2.0.46 on Redhat 9 (2.4.20-9) shows the
> following:
> 
> ldd /home/apache/lib/libapr-0.so.0.9.4
>  libdb-4.0.so => /lib/libdb-4.0.so
>  libgdbm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.2
>  libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2
>  libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0
>  libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6
>  libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 
>  libsasl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libsasl.so.7
>  libssl.so.4 => /lib/libssl.so.4
>  libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4
>  liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2
>  /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>  libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2
>  libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1
>  libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0
>  libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2
>  libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => 
>    /usr/kerberos/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
>  libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3 
>  libk5crypto.so.3 =>
> /usr/kerberos/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 
>  libcom_err.so.3 => /usr/kerberos/lib/libcom_err.so.3
>  libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
> 
> ldd /home/apache/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4
>  libdb-4.0.so => /lib/libdb-4.0.so
>  libgdbm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.2
>  libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2
>  libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0
>  libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6
>  libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
>  libsasl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libsasl.so.7
>  libssl.so.4 => /lib/libssl.so.4
>  libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4
>  liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2
>  /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>  libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2
>  libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1
>  libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0
>  libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2
>  libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => 
>   /usr/kerberos/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
>  libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3 
>  libk5crypto.so.3 =>
> /usr/kerberos/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 
>  libcom_err.so.3 => /usr/kerberos/lib/libcom_err.so.3 
>  libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
> 
> So I guess strictly speaking if you build libapr and
> libaprutil with the appropriate LDFLAGS, you should
> not need them to build mod_jk2.so and jkjni.so.
> 
> I found if you don't use 
> 
> --with-os-type=include/linux
> 
> in your configure command, UNIX sockets (jkjni.so)
> will fail with the following error:
> 
> INFO: APR not loaded, disabling jni components:
> java.io.IOException: initialize
> Exception during startup processing
> . . . . .
> Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: getJkEnv
> at org.apache.jk.apr.AprImpl.getJkEnv(Native Method)
> 
> About the environment variables . . . I think that if
> you get libapr and libaprutil built with the listed
> environment variables you should not need them when
> building mod_jk2.so and jkjni.so.
> 
> Messier details are probably better discussed by the
> developers who know the internals of this code.  I'm
> just beginning to look at it for the following
> reasons:
> 
> 1. Submit a patch for autoconf to get the right
> configure script built.
> 
> 2. Look at a new MPM module in Apache for Linux and
> the new thread model that will support in-process
> communication.
> 
> When I get to it I don't know since most of my time is
> spent looking for employment.
> 
> HTH
> 
> /mde/
> just my two cents . . . .
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to