Thanks Mark,
I have it currently running bypassing the mod_jk with rewrite to port 8080.
The memory has ramped to 327 mb so far which is not anything to worry about.
I had this problem on our linux box but I had forgotten the -server option
and that took care of it.
The problem is, windows doesnt accept -server.
Ill continue to monitor it with the mod_jk bypass in.
James
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> I've just set 5.0.25 up and it will run with mod_jk/1.2.3-dev and
> Apache/2.0.47 , I'll see if i get the same thing happening.
>
> When i was having problems i was getting a decoding error written to
> catalina log, which 5.0.24+ hasn't given me. 5.0.24 has been working
> quite happily but the next man mentioned a session error so I took his
> word for it and upgraded.
>
> You could have tomcat being served from an ip alias, but will depend on
> you configuration. And might take longer than getting jk sorted.
>
> For the moment I can just say i'll keep and eye on things and see if
> the same happens to me.
>
> Mark
>
> On 31 May 2004, at 14:23, James Sherwood wrote:
>
> > There are no errors anywhere that I can find in any logs. The memory
> > just
> > slowly ramps up till an out of memory error happens.
> >
> > James
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> >
> >
> >> What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
> >>> 5.0.25
> >>> and Apache 2.049
> >>>
> >>> I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am
> >>> not
> >>> actually serving up anything with apache yet I want to just bypass
> >>> the
> >>> connector for 1 site and hit tomcat directly. I have to use apache
> >>> for
> >>> other
> >>> things on the server so I cannot just use tomcat.
> >>>
> >>> Any idea the best route for this? (of course a fix for the leak is
> >>> the
> >>> best
> >>> route:)
> >>> My route works but certian urls within the site do not work(although
> >>> I
> >>> think
> >>> I could get them working).
> >>>
> >>> The way I have done it is this:
> >>>
> >>> <VirtualHost *>
> >>>
> >>> ServerName mysite.ca
> >>>
> >>> RewriteEngine on
> >>>
> >>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.mysite\.ca$ [NC]
> >>>
> >>> RewriteRule ^(.*) http://localhost:8080$1 [p]
> >>>
> >>> </VirtualHost>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, James
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
