I use the term support loosely when talking about covalent. They are unable to provide us with any direction regarding this problem.....
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:51:38 -0400, Michael Medwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our company uses covalent for support, I am a mere developer. I don't > even have control or major influence of the platforms or > administration. I will mention that right away... > > To be honest, I have a feeling its something code/network related > because it was happening prior to apache 2.0... > > Any more suggestions would be much appreciated, is there anything I > can research or look for in code or logs or status pages? > > -Mike > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:44:36 +0100, Dale, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Out of interest is there any reason why you aren't using JK2? Have you tried it? > > This was designed for Apache 2 so may work better. I'm sure this isn't relevant > > but it might be worth a shot. > > > > > > Ta > > Matt > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Medwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 20 September 2004 15:42 > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: Connections backup for modjk, all w's > > > > apache 2.050 > > tomcat 4.1.27 > > mod jk, 1.41_05, sometimes _06 > > > > -Mike > > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:21:04 +0100, Dale, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > What versions of the 3 components are you using? > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael Medwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 20 September 2004 15:11 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Connections backup for modjk, all w's > > > > > > I am really lost on this one, my application at work (running with > > > apache/tomcat/modjk) is locking up with all "W"s. We have 5 new > > > solaris machines running tomcat and 5 more with apache (1 to 1 > > > relationship). > > > > > > The application seems to lock up on a regular basis. The most useful > > > information to this point is our apache server-status which shows > > > hundreds of "W"'s implying that we are writing responses back to > > > users. The fact is none of these responses are supposed to be long > > > writes. > > > > > > Has anyone ever filled up their apache queue with all "W"s? What are > > > somethings to look into on this. > > > > > > Some things that we have looked into that have resulted in no leads: > > > > > > Connections to all databases are low in any, > > > No apparent network clogs on internal network, > > > Unable to reproduce under software load testing, > > > > > > Anyone with any suggestions or more questions would be much > > > appreciated, we have been dealing with this for quite some time now > > > with no hope of a remedy in the near future. > > > > > > -Mike Medwith > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
