It's amazing to see that RPM works is still not known ...
For example in 3.3 tree
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m2/rpms/
PS: Redhat Linux 6.2 + updates. (rpm -qpi --changelog
tomcat-mod-3.3-m2.1.i386.rpm)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:52 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk advice
>
>
>At 09:27 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>>It would be nice if they published what version of
>Linux/Apache/Tomcat the
>>available binary was compiled for. I think it's pretty
>confusing for new
>>users when you say "Hey, here's a binary", but they don't
>understand all the
>>reasons why it won't work with their platform. It's such an
>easy process to
>>compile your own -- especially with the Makefile's provided.
>Maybe they
>>should just get rid of the binary and distribute the mod_jk
>source with
>>every Tomcat distribution. Is that feasible?
>
>
>I would think distributing the source would be
>much easier than distributing binaries. They
>could even distribute the source as a Linux-
>style RPM, for those who prefer that platform,
>sure.
>
>
