>What's amazing is that there are no links to these on the
>website. How are
>people supposed to find them?
>
>--jeff
Redhat RPM are available for many jakarta.apache.org
projects (ant, oro, tomcat, ...) and xml.apache.org
(xerces, xalan, cocoon).
But RPM are just a Linux packaging method. Some sub projects
add link to the RPM sub-dirs but not all. It depends on
projects managers to add the revelant RPM dirs, and even if
I'm a jakarta commiter and do RPM packaging, but I can't modify
all projects pages for all the release for all projects.
But I created a site which announce and host all the RPM :
http://rpmized.free.fr/
You could find there the announce of the RPM and also the
RPM. All jakarta and xml projects packaged are referenced
and also some Apache related (Apache 2.0, apache-mod_ssl...)
Regards
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:24 PM
>Subject: RE: mod_jk advice
>
>
>> It's amazing to see that RPM works is still not known ...
>>
>> For example in 3.3 tree
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m2/rpms/
>>
>> PS: Redhat Linux 6.2 + updates. (rpm -qpi --changelog
>> tomcat-mod-3.3-m2.1.i386.rpm)
>>
>> -
>> Henri Gomez ___[_]____
>> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
>> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Tim O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:52 PM
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Subject: Re: mod_jk advice
>> >
>> >
>> >At 09:27 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>> >>It would be nice if they published what version of
>> >Linux/Apache/Tomcat the
>> >>available binary was compiled for. I think it's pretty
>> >confusing for new
>> >>users when you say "Hey, here's a binary", but they don't
>> >understand all the
>> >>reasons why it won't work with their platform. It's such an
>> >easy process to
>> >>compile your own -- especially with the Makefile's provided.
>> >Maybe they
>> >>should just get rid of the binary and distribute the mod_jk
>> >source with
>> >>every Tomcat distribution. Is that feasible?
>> >
>> >
>> >I would think distributing the source would be
>> >much easier than distributing binaries. They
>> >could even distribute the source as a Linux-
>> >style RPM, for those who prefer that platform,
>> >sure.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
