Thanks! I'll check out your site.
--jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk advice
> >What's amazing is that there are no links to these on the
> >website. How are
> >people supposed to find them?
> >
> >--jeff
>
> Redhat RPM are available for many jakarta.apache.org
> projects (ant, oro, tomcat, ...) and xml.apache.org
> (xerces, xalan, cocoon).
>
> But RPM are just a Linux packaging method. Some sub projects
> add link to the RPM sub-dirs but not all. It depends on
> projects managers to add the revelant RPM dirs, and even if
>
> I'm a jakarta commiter and do RPM packaging, but I can't modify
> all projects pages for all the release for all projects.
>
> But I created a site which announce and host all the RPM :
>
> http://rpmized.free.fr/
>
> You could find there the announce of the RPM and also the
> RPM. All jakarta and xml projects packaged are referenced
> and also some Apache related (Apache 2.0, apache-mod_ssl...)
>
> Regards
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:24 PM
> >Subject: RE: mod_jk advice
> >
> >
> >> It's amazing to see that RPM works is still not known ...
> >>
> >> For example in 3.3 tree
> >>
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m2/rpms/
> >>
> >> PS: Redhat Linux 6.2 + updates. (rpm -qpi --changelog
> >> tomcat-mod-3.3-m2.1.i386.rpm)
> >>
> >> -
> >> Henri Gomez ___[_]____
> >> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
> >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Tim O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:52 PM
> >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Subject: Re: mod_jk advice
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >At 09:27 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >> >>It would be nice if they published what version of
> >> >Linux/Apache/Tomcat the
> >> >>available binary was compiled for. I think it's pretty
> >> >confusing for new
> >> >>users when you say "Hey, here's a binary", but they don't
> >> >understand all the
> >> >>reasons why it won't work with their platform. It's such an
> >> >easy process to
> >> >>compile your own -- especially with the Makefile's provided.
> >> >Maybe they
> >> >>should just get rid of the binary and distribute the mod_jk
> >> >source with
> >> >>every Tomcat distribution. Is that feasible?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I would think distributing the source would be
> >> >much easier than distributing binaries. They
> >> >could even distribute the source as a Linux-
> >> >style RPM, for those who prefer that platform,
> >> >sure.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
