1 - you can go either way. On my systems, there are separate Tomcats, each with one Connector. Others do it differently.
John > -----Original Message----- > From: Pedro Salazar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:18 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x > > > <clear> > OK, I wasn't clear about the workers.properties. I was > thinking that it > was also used by tomcat. I thought that I could configure several > workers by in configuration file that a tomcat would create on > initialization. Workers to me were processes: 2 workers for > apj13, more > 2 for apj14, .... But, workers are just *tomcat instances*! In that > context, workers.properties only have meaning to apache! I'm > clear now, > thanks! > </clear> > > <two-more-things> > <one> > To have several tomcat instances in one machine, they must run in > different ports. To achieve that we should create several Connectors > configured in different ports on the server.xml, or should we run > different processes (different JVMs) by running several "catalinas"? > </one> > <two> > So, what could be wrong when I use the CoyoteConnector? The > workers.properties should be the same as for the > Apj13Connector, and it > works with me! > </two> > </two-more-thing> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
