Jamie Nguyen wrote: > Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Jamie Nguyen wrote: > >> I made changes in r4992 due to the contents page for 1.8.x docs > >> possibly being too scary for new users and being a little too verbose. > > > > OK. I updated Japanese part. > > > >> I will be starting work on tomoyo 2.3 docs tomorrow. > > > > I was planning to start it today. ;-) > > So, last night I once deleted 2.3-tmp and re-copied from 1.8. > > Rough changes are done by now (revision 5002), but screenshots > > need to be retaken. I'll start retaking screenshots. > > Nice work! 2.3-tmp looks pretty good so far. Any further work we need > to do in 2.3-tmp?
I will merge texts/screenshots in 2.3 into 2.3-tmp. > By the way, is 2.4 going to make 2.6.40? I saw your posting of 38 > patches to LSM but it seems only a few have been applied to > security-testing#next TOMOYO 2.4 is blocked at "[07/38] LSM: Revive security_task_alloc()/security_task_free()/security_bprm_free() hooks." in the "[PATCH 0/38] TOMOYO: Starting toward TOMOYO 2.4." patchset. Yama and Snet will also use security_task_free() hook. David, may I have your answer regarding this patch? _______________________________________________ tomoyo-dev-en mailing list tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-dev-en
