On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tom Oehser wrote:
>
> I'll probably maybe change it to something like 10.254.253.252, as that
> will probably be less likely to be really in use than 192.168.0.1, which
> is common in real private networks.
>
> Clark.net is not in use, just start with the mirrors on www.toms.net/rb/,
> such as Tux or Utx, and look in the add-ons directoriy.
Damn right, I use 192.168.0.1 myself!
Just a thought though, I think the 172.16.0.0/12 range is even less used
especially toward the top eg: 172.30.255.1
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>)
<http://www.cix.co.uk/~mayday>
Google Homepage: http://www.google.com/search?btnI&q=Robert+de+Bath
