>>>>> "stevel" == Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
stevel> My feeling is that it would actually be better to not carry stevel> *any* history forward in a rename Do you mean any rename, or just "renames" that move a file from one repo to another? stevel> any time a file moves across repositories, it would appear as a stevel> new file with no prior history. I know it's not optimal in that stevel> it loses code deltas, but it removes this strange changeset stevel> problem we'd have otherwise Is the problem just that it looks funny, or are there other issues? The one issue I can think of with broken-up changesets is when someone is looking for "the fix for CR 1234567". That is, they might stop when they've found the first such changeset in the log, not realizing that there are others. mike _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
