> >> (If that's confusing, let me know - I can draw the same whiteboard > >> drawing Danek drew for me which is clearer) > > > > It seems to me that *someone* should draw it, and post it. > > > > - Stephen > > Attached.
Thanks for the picture. While I know very little about Mercurial at this point, I like the idea of having each snapshot be represented as a branch. > If you look at the image, the central "spine" is the main tree. With > the branches coming off (tagged in blue). What I was trying to convey > is that we're used to "tip" being the most recent putback in the main > tree, i.e.: putback 6. In the branches case, if onnv_60 branched off, > and there were respins or backouts that came in *after* putback6 went > in, then "tip" would point to a changeset in the onnv_60 branch, rather > than the main branch. Seems like it should be possible to make Mercurial grok this and do the right thing, no? -- meem _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
