> The thing here is that 'hg pull -u' takes you to the latest (by time) > change. So whether we gave the center line a real name you could hg > update to or not, it'd still be fairly unusual behaviour as compared to > what both sets of people (TW users, and Hg users) are used to. > > I don't see anyway to make mercurial "do the right thing", especially when > "the right thing" is entirely subjective, except keep local modifications > (and even then, I haven't actually looked into what would be required).
As an example, maybe Mercurial could be configured to know that when no specific branch is specified, "pull -u" should operate relative to something that's been designated as the main trunk. (Apologies if my terms are confusing here. I don't speak Mercurial yet.) -- meem _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
