Glynn Foster wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>>>> It looks like there's 8 open defects & RFEs in defect.opensolaris.org and 3
>>>> open defects & RFE's in bugs.opensolaris.org related to the website. I'd be
>>>> willing to work on any of them. Though it sounds from your e-mail that
>>>> someone needs to compile the list and initiate a discussion with the
>>>> community to prioritize them?
>>>> Is that something we can help with?
>>>>
>>> Yes, in my opinion, the consolidating/prioritizing task would be
>>> valuable too.
>> If anyone tackles that, there's a lot more than 3 open bugs.  When I
>> query the bugster database internally, I get 106 open bugs in
>> solaris/opensolaris/websiteright now.  Unfortunately, it looks like
>> getting the list out of bugs.opensolaris.org is a bit harder, since
>> you have to search each of the possible states.
> 
> Would it be interesting to do a mass transfer from bugs.opensolaris.org to 
> defect.opensolaris.org of that sub-category? Given most of those bugs would 
> be 
> related to opensolaris infrastructure, defect.opensolaris.org might be more 
> appropriate for encouraging contributions.

I think it would be interesting, especially if there's no integration with
any tools like WebRTI that the website team requires for their bugs - do we
have a good way to do this yet?

Also, should bugs.os.o be modified to refer users to defect.os.o when filing
new website bugs?

-- 
     -Alan Coopersmith-           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to